LATEST POST

The Economic Level of Leakage: Balancing Costs and Water Loss

Read time:
2 min

The Economic Level of Leakage (ELL) is a crucial concept for water utilities, helping determine the most cost-effective point at which to control leakage. By balancing the cost of reducing leakage against the cost of lost water, ELL aims to optimise investment and operational decisions. However, several factors can complicate this calculation, particularly when relying on inaccurate NRW data from methods like mass balancing.

Key Components of ELL Calculation

  1. Cost of Water Production: Underestimating leakage due to inaccurate mass balancing data leads to a miscalculation of the true volume of water lost. If the actual leakage is higher than estimated, the cost of producing additional water to replace that lost to leaks is also underreported.
  2. Value of Lost Water: ELL depends on accurately valuing the water lost through leaks. Underestimating leakage means undervaluing the true cost of lost water, including potential revenue that could have been generated if that water had been sold to customers.
  3. Cost of Leakage Reduction Measures: If leakage is underestimated, there may be less incentive to invest in leakage detection and repair technologies. This can result in continued underinvestment in necessary infrastructure and technology improvements.
  4. Short-Term Focus: ELL often encourages a short-term financial view. It focuses on balancing current costs rather than investing in long-term sustainability, which can be detrimental, especially in the face of climate change and urban growth.
  5. Static and Inflexible: The ELL does not dynamically adjust to changing conditions or future needs. As cost variables and water value change, the ELL can become outdated, leading utilities to underinvest in technology and infrastructure necessary to manage leaks efficiently.
  6. Underestimates True Costs: ELL calculations might not fully account for externalities such as environmental impacts, water scarcity risks, and social costs. This underestimation can lead to lower investment in leakage management than what might be necessary from an environmental and social perspective.

Conclusion Understanding the true costs associated with water leakage and accurately calculating the Economic Level of Leakage are vital for water utilities to make informed, sustainable decisions. This requires comprehensive data and a willingness to invest in long-term solutions, highlighting the importance of accurate NRW measurement methods.

RECENT

Contact

Book a call with our project leader to see how we can best work together.

mail
contact@leakster.com.au
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form. Please try again or send an email directly to info@leakster.com.au